Two champions of "rigorous science" fail to prove COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis: The Guardian
LONDON, Nov. 19 (Xinhua) -- Two champions of "rigorous science" failed to provide a shred of evidence that COVID-19 was engineered and leaked from a lab, The Guardian has recently reported.
Matt Ridley, a Conservative hereditary peer best known for his sceptical writings on climate change, and Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, ventured into the deepest recesses of cyberspace in their "Search for the Origin of COVID-19," aided by an eclectic band of internet sleuths who go by such names as the "Seeker," said the report.
However, nowhere do they present proof that the novel coronavirus was manufactured, it noted, stressing that Chan's claim that the virus appeared pre-adapted to human transmission "to an extent similar to late epidemic Sars" is highly misleading.
"The tragedy is that in their desire to make a plausible case for a lab accident, Chan and Ridley neglect the far more urgent and compelling story of how the trade in wild animals, coupled with global heating and the destruction of natural habitats, makes the emergence of pandemic viruses increasingly likely," it said.
Photos
Related Stories
- Chinese mainland reports three locally transmitted COVID-19 cases
- Children aged 3 to 11 receive COVID-19 vaccines in Beijing
- Declassified gov't report provides no support for lab-leak theory on COVID-19: Los Angeles Times
- Beijing administers over 950,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses to children
- 3 COVID-19 patients &asymptomatic person discharged from hospital in Dalian
- Hong Kong reports 1 new imported COVID-19 case
Copyright © 2021 People's Daily Online. All Rights Reserved.