Australian senator Nick Xenophon recently slammed the country's decision to outsource production of its military uniforms to China, calling it a "shame." Defence Minister Marise Payne responded on Sept. 12, pointing out that if the uniforms were produced locally, their cost would be three times higher.

Australian Defence Apparel (ADA) confirmed to the media on Sept. 11 that the company outsourced its $9 million non-combat uniforms contract to a Chinese manufacturer, causing the domestic controversy.

ABC reported that Xenophon publicly voiced his strong opposition, arguing that the Australian Department of Defence had ignored the economic value of buying local.

"If something is a little more expensive on the surface here in Australia, but it means we're going to get all sorts of flow on benefits in terms of jobs ... economic activity and tax and other benefits, then it's a no-brainer," he said.

The Department of Defence awarded the uniform contract to ADA on April 30, 2015. ADA then arranged open overseas bidding, finally signing a subcontract with a Chinese manufacturer. The contract is for two years.

The uniforms being made in China are “noncombat clothing,” mainly used for formal occasions like attending events and parade. The Department of Defence holds the view that Chinese-made clothing offers the best value for the money, given its cheap price tag and decent quality.

However, the department's response hasn't satisfied Xenophon. He said he would ask for a detailed explanation of the decision from Payne herself.