Should China continue to pursue the principle of non-interference? (2)

The most typical circumstance is the Kosovo War started by the United States and the NATO at the end of last century. Another one is the "color revolutions" launched in Central Asia and many other places in the first decade of this century, although they were seldom successful.

The Libyan War was also a typical example. Under the name to "protect civilians", it actually resulted in a large number of casualties.

Now, the United States wants to play its same old trick on Syria, by attempting to pursue the policies of "new interventionism" and "regime change" once again.

In this case, China used its power of veto in the resolutions on interference in internal affairs and thus showed its respect to the Principles of the United Nations Charter, and its positive deeds under the new situation.

Read the Chinese version: 中国外交的变与不变（上）：“不干涉内政”还要不要？; Source: Jiefang Daily; Author: Wang Yusheng

Most viewed commentaries
China is no military threat despite commissioning of aircraft carrier	Overseas Chinese's participation in politics becomes irresistible trend	China’s path to democracy
Will U.S. security defense deployment make Asia safe?	Why the 18th CPC National Congress attracts global attention	Cancellation of Japan-U.S. joint drill does not mean showing weakness