Latest News:  


Seven institutions demand 'tobacco science member' reinvestigation


17:21, March 13, 2013

BEIJING, March 13 (Xinhua) -- Seven health associations have demanded the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) reinvestigate tobacco researcher Xie Jianping's academic fraud and revoke his membership, the Health News, a national health-centered newspaper, reported on Wednesday.

The seven associations jointly submitted a letter to the CAE.

The associations include the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, China Association of Health Promotion and Education, China Antituberculosis Association and the Think Tank Research Center for Health Development.

The letter accused Xie of using the obsolete Cambridge Filter Method to assess "low-tar and less harmful cigarettes," and based his academic success on the research of "low-tar cigaretts," including securing a seat in the prestigious CAE.

The Cambridge Filter Method is a test procedure to determine the tar and nicotine content of cigarettes but was later proven to be meaningless because smokers were found to "compensate," or adjust how they smoke, to get the amount of nicotine they need from a cigarette.

The method has long been used by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission but dropped by the body in 2008.

The letter accused the CAE of shunning public challenges, giving no mention of suspicions raised by the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control, and turning deaf ears to opinions of more than 100 academy members.

The elite academic body included member Xie Jianping in December 2011, which created controversy among the public and media.

Xie was given the seat for his research on low-tar and herbal cigarettes at an institute under the China National Tobacco Corporation (China Tobacco).

Later, hundreds of academics from the CAE and other institutions tried to persuade Xie to give up his seat, as well as request the CAE to review Xie's membership.

On Feb. 1, the CAE announced the initial investigation results, saying Xie's seat was valid, because the nomination and appraisal procedures conformed with relevant regulations and had been reported to the State Council.

The seven institutions disagree with the CAE, saying if the nomination runs against scientific ethics and spirit, then it is pointless in discussing whether the nomination conforms with procedures.

Email|Print|Comments(Editor:LiXiang、Chen Lidan)

Leave your comment0 comments

  1. Name


Selections for you

  1. Naval escort taskforce in anti-hijack exercise

  2. Armored regiment in live-ammunition drill

  3. Kim Jong Un visits Defence Detachment

  4. China's five-decade efforts of turning green

  5. 2,800 dead pigs found in Shanghai river

  6. Modern life of Chinese elderly

  7. Is it cute or scary?

  8. Nature's nirvana

  9. Boeing 787 plan for battery fix approved

  10. China's fiscal policy over past 5 years

Most Popular


  1. Efforts needed to nurture ethnic culture, language
  2. Filipina maids or local ayi?
  3. China won't take part in currency wars
  4. Long live the kingdom of bicycles!
  5. Income gap still hot topic
  6. Bigger does not always mean better for megacities
  7. Railway ministry revamp will not impact ratings
  8. Active yet prudent urbanization needed for China
  9. China's dating TV show inspires copycat in Chicago
  10. Int'l influence of Chinese films improving

What’s happening in China

14 killed, 9 injured in central China traffic accident

  1. Man who kept sex slave detained
  2. Caring for families that lost their only child
  3. Ministry's surrogacy crackdown to continue
  4. Beijing subway overtakes Moscow as busiest
  5. High-end restaurant forced to drop prices