Latest News:  


US public ready to be fooled again on Iran

(Global Times)

08:39, June 18, 2013

"Hindsight is 20/20," as the recent New York Times/CBS News polls regarding US foreign policy show. While the US public has wisely become more suspicious of most plans for US-led military action, it remains willing to accept the use of force against Iran, for many of the same reasons it initially accepted the Iraq conflict.

When asked if the US should continue to take the lead in military operations, approximately 60 percent of the respondents answered in the negative. This is in contrast to the polls taken on the eve of the Iraq War, which showed increasing support as the conflict drew closer, albeit with a number of fluctuations depending on how the question was phrased. However, the later progress of the Iraq conflict and occupation is likely one of the reasons for the decline in support for future open-ended commitments.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars were both sold to the US public by claiming that they would be decisive, quick and inexpensive. That last became such an article of faith that Lawrence B. Lindsey, assistant to the president on economic policy, was forced to resign from his position in the Bush administration for suggesting that the total price for the Iraq War might reach $200 billion.

However, the US has seen the financial and human cost of both conflicts rise far beyond those initial and wildly optimistic estimates. And while a US withdrawal will reduce those ongoing costs, the US will be forced to continue to provide both nations with military aid for the foreseeable future.

Finally, neither conflict provided the unambiguous victory promised by its backers. Both Iraq and Afghanistan remain in some disorder, and it is an open question as to how viable either government will be in the long term.

In fact, instead of the proclamations that the Taliban would be forever driven from power that were heard in the early days of the invasion, British Foreign Secretary William Hague has recently stated his hopes that the Taliban will at some point sit down for peace negotiations. Needless to say, this is not the outcome that was initially predicted by the backers of regime change.

Additionally, it is now widely believed that the risks of both the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts were deliberately concealed by the Bush administration. In Iraq at least, the case for war was drastically overstated, which had the effect of convincing the US people that not only were the risks small, but that the war was vital to US national security interests.

Because of this, the fact that the US people are in principle less eager to enter into yet another open-ended and US-led conflict is easy to understand. However, the poll results regarding Iran show that the US voters can still be exploited by interventionist rhetoric.

For Iran, the poll question "Would you favor or oppose the US taking military action against Iran in order to prevent them from producing a nuclear weapon?" makes two assumptions that are eerily similar to those made before the invasion of Iraq.

Firstly, it assumes that Iran is currently in the process of producing a nuclear weapon. The breathless comments about "red lines" and uranium processing are almost identical to the prewar predictions about Iraq's weapon of mass destruction forces. Secondly, the question not only assumes that military force would be necessary, but also implies that this force would be effective and decisive.

Of course, this is arrant nonsense. A military strike on Iran would almost certainly commit the US to long-term military operations within Iran, would lead to an end to international support for US-led sanctions, and would certainly lead to increased regional instability. It might in fact lead to the very thing it is supposed to stop, a decision on the part of Iran's leadership to develop and field nuclear weapons, regardless of the cost.

In fact, when poll questions also mention the possible long-term costs, public support for military action swiftly falls.

Ultimately, while the US public now seems to understand the risks of following the neocon strategy, it must be certain to apply those lessons to future conflicts.

Only by remaining wary of one-sided and misleading information and working to ensure that the US government understands that the people remain opposed to unwise and open-ended military commitments can we avoid a repetition of the neocon dream that became a US nightmare.

The author is a freelance writer based in Corona, California.

We recommend:

Royal Exhibition Building, Carlton Gardens

World's tallest twisted tower opens in Dubai

Swedish Princess Madeleine marries U.S. banker

'50th Exhibition of classic vintage cars kicks off

Beatles' wax figures exhibited

Pole Dance National Day marked in Mexico

Email|Print|Comments(Editor:LiangJun、Yao Chun)

Related Reading

Leave your comment1 comments

  1. Name

McCarthy at 2013-06-18206.125.84.*
The US media or as I refer to it as "The mouth piece for imperialism", has no credibility what so ever. Poll questions are skewed to illicit the answer the government wants. A recent and typical example is how the US corportate media has turn the PRISM leak from a debate about state abuse of human and civil rights, into a debate about whether Mr. Snowden is a traitor or not and what Mr. Snowden did when he was a teenager. The United States corporate media is the slickest propaganda machine since the Nazi regime. As far as a war against Iran that is already decided regardless of public opinion. The only opinion which matters in US politics is the opinion of the political and financial elite 1%. The elite know very well that as soon as the war starts no matter what public opinion is, it will ralley behind the government like sheep being lead to slaughter.

Selections for you

  1. Special operation members in training

  2. Venezuelan Army School boat visits Cuba

  3. 50th Int'l Paris Air Show kicks off

  4. Heatweave overwhelms Shanghai, Yangzhou

  5. Photos: The ordinary love

  6. China’s weekly story (2013.6.7-6.14)

  7. Amazing Narati Scenic Spot in Xinjiang

  8. Top 10 highest-paid athletes

  9. China is the largest buyer of high-end cameras

  10. ATC Show 2013 closes in Beijing

Most Popular


  1. Risks, opportunities in oil, gas sector: E&Y
  2. Creative industries go high-tech and high end
  3. Why fear and loathing of an IPO?
  4. US public ready to be fooled again on Iran
  5. Weibo draws more than just locals
  6. Keeping a watchful eye on Japan’s 'new cold war'
  7. In praise of graffiti and holiday photos
  8. The thinking behind U.S. surveillance programs
  9. China's space program less costly
  10. SCO chief lauds Harbin fair's co-op contribution

What’s happening in China

Sweating at Yoga club: white collars' new choice after work

  1. Beijing on alert for Middle East virus
  2. Torrential rain affects over 17,000 in Xinjiang
  3. 'Gay' wives are anything but gay
  4. Sedan becomes minister's car
  5. Gov't bans private adoptions of abandoned infants