Double standards

China's export restrictions have no impact on global demand. Some western countries have claimed that China's actions are unreasonable because they no longer have access to unlimited resources at low prices, therefore they will have to pay a higher price for their supplies.

China already pays a high price for acting as the world's supplier. But some western countries refuse to acknowledge the sacrifice of China's environment, and the WTO has chosen to ignore those countries which implement strict regulation of exports. Instead, it has ruled against restrictions that aim to protect China's environment. The ruling could force China to abandon effective protective measures and turn to less efficient ways to rehabilitate the environment.

Environmental protection will continue

China will not step down in the face of this unreasonable judgment - we will continue to protect our homeland. Under WTO rules, China can lodge an appeal within 60 days.

"China will put its weight behind an appeal," says Shen Danyang. "And whatever the result, China's policy of protecting its resources and its environment will not change. We will however continue to strengthen management of resources in line with WTO rules, and ensure fair competition."

China's appeal represents a more important principle - that its export restrictions aim to conserve resources and protect the environment not only in China, but throughout the world. If China allows chaotic exploitation to continue, some minerals will run out, and it will be to the detriment of all parties concerned.

The article is edited and translated from 《稀土官司难撼中国环保目标》, source: People's Daily Overseas Edition