Help | Sitemap | Archive | Advanced Search   
  CHINA
  BUSINESS
  OPINION
  WORLD
  SCI-EDU
  SPORTS
  LIFE
  WAP SERVICE
  FEATURES
  PHOTO GALLERY

Message Board
Feedback
Voice of Readers
 China At a Glance
 Constitution of the PRC
 CPC and State Organs
 Chinese President Jiang Zemin
 White Papers of Chinese Government
 Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping
 English Websites in China
Help
About Us
SiteMap
Employment

U.S. Mirror
Japan Mirror
Tech-Net Mirror
Edu-Net Mirror
 
Friday, September 28, 2001, updated at 08:33(GMT+8)
World  

Israeli-Palestinian Clashes Bring About Lose-Lose Situation

Up till Friday, Israel and the Palestinians have been mired in the cycle of deadly violence for one year, dealing a heavy blow to both sides in terms of peace- making efforts, diplomacy and economy.

The Palestinians, frustrated by Israeli failure to make significant concessions in the negotiations on Jerusalem, return of refugees, territories and other key issues, rise up against Israeli occupation in a bid to force a compromise.

The Israelis, responding excessively and arrogantly in the position of an occupier, try to suppress the Palestinian uprising by resorting to advanced weapons. But they find that more Palestinians have stood up to them after hundreds of Palestinians were killed.

In the end, neither side has gained its goals but suffered heavy losses in various fields.

On the peace-making front, Israel has lost a chance to reach reconciliation earlier with the Palestinians, and then the whole Arab world, while the Palestinians lost a chance to establish an independent state in 2000 under signed agreements.

The clashes have also pushed more Israelis and Palestinians into extreme wings, and jeopardized peace camps, thus dampening chances to re-start the final-status talks in the foreseeable future.

According to the Peace Index survey, conducted since 1994 by the Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research in Israel's Tel Aviv University, the Oslo peace index indicating the Israelis' attitude toward the Oslo peace accord fell significantly to 30.4 last August from 45.3 last year.

The trend was already showed in Israel's prime ministerial election in February, in which hawkish challenger Ariel Sharon trounced left-wing incumbent prime minister Ehud Barak by the largest margin in Israel's election history.

Though Ehud Barak's Labor Party later joined the national unity government, the coalition has been dominated by the right-wing parties, such as the Likud led by Sharon, Shas, the National Union- Yisrael Beiteinu, and Yisrael Ba'aliya.

Moreover, Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer, a Labor Party member, represents the right wing of the dovish party.

Meanwhile, Israel's eye-for-eye military policy and tight closure on Palestinian territories did not succeed in forcing the Palestinians to give in, instead, the policies irritated them and sowed the seed of hatred in the hearts of the Palestinians.

According to a survey published by the Palestinians' Jerusalem Media and Communications Center last Tuesday, only 29.2 percent of Palestinian interviewees support the Oslo accord, which was signed in 1993.

In addition, 48.5 percent of the interviewees said that the goal of the current intifada, or popular uprising, was "the liberation of all Palestine," including Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This public opinion has weakened the moderate wing of the Palestinian leadership, such as the camp formed by Palestinian Legislative Council Speaker Ahmed Qurei and Mohmoud Abbas, secretary general of the Palestine Liberation Organization's Executive Committee.

Meanwhile, radical leaders, including Marwan Barghouti, head of the Palestinian mainstream Fatah movement in the West Bank, and radical groups, such as the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and the Islamic Jihad (Holy War), have become more and more popular.

Due to the Israeli closure that cut the Palestinian areas, some local Palestinian leaders have become more independent and publicly defied Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's ceasefire order, casting a shadow over the future peace talks.

On the diplomatic front, both sides, especially Israel, also have lost scores.

Due to the conflict, lukewarm relations between Israel and Arab neighbors deteriorated further: the countries which want to develop relations with the Jewish state abandoned such an idea, those which have unofficial relations with Israel closed its interest offices, and Egypt and Jordan, which have diplomatic relations with Israel, recalled their ambassadors and still refrained from sending them back.

The sufferings of the Palestinians under the Israeli occupation were broadcast worldwide, bringing about stern condemnation of Israel and sympathy for the Palestinians.

This was seen at the World Conference Against Racism in the South Africa early this month.

In terms of the international mediation efforts, the European Union has adopted an even more balanced and just policy than the United States.

Even the U.S., the most ardent supporter of Israel, has shown some impatience and unease toward Israel's bully policy against the Palestinians. U.S. officials have even demanded that Israel stop using American-made fighter jets against the Palestinians.

For the Palestinians, their suicide bombing attacks hurt innocent civilians in Israel and thereby were not favored by the international community.

Turning to the economic front, both sides suffered enormous losses.

According to statistics released by Israel's Finance Ministry last Tuesday, its gross domestic product (GDP) will grow by only 0. 5-1 percent in 2001, far less than the estimated 4 percent.

Finance Ministry expert Michael Sarel told Xinhua that the violence has eaten into at least two percentage points of the GDP growth, amounting to 2.4 billion U.S. dollars. Furthermore, the forecast of Israel's GDP growth in 2002 has been downgraded from 4 percent to 2-2.5 percent.

This year would be the worst for Israel's tourism industry in a decade, with a reduction of about 50 percent in the number of tourists in the first six months from the same period last year. Economic losses in tourism industry already amounted to 1.2 billion dollars.

Meanwhile, construction and agriculture are also in the red because they could never hire those low-salary Palestinian workers and farmers, who are barred from entering Israel.

For the Palestinians, the clashes brought about even more economic losses. According to Palestinian sources, the one-year-old clashes have so far resulted in an economic loss of at least 5.4 billion dollars.

About 300,000 Palestinians lost their jobs in Israel and the unemployment rate in most Palestinian cities rocketed to 50 percent.

The Israeli army has also chopped down thousands of fruit trees, damaged Palestinian crops, and demolished Palestinian homes to ensure the safety of Jewish settlers.

According to Peter Hansen, commissioner general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, more than half of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip will live below the poverty line by the end of this year.

In short, the Palestinian economy, which depends on water, electricity and fuel provision by Israel, is at the edge of total collapse.

Palestinian experts estimated that even the clashes stopped now, the Palestinians would at least need three years to restore the economic situation to normal.

Therefore, there was only a lose-lose situation in the clashes.

Neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians have gained enough to balance their losses, so it is imperative for both sides to end the violence and return to the negotiating table.

On Wednesday, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and Arafat reached an agreement on sustaining a ceasefire on the ground, a glimmer of hope that the two sides have finally been sick of the heavy losses.

However, as experiences proved now and then in the one-year-old violence, it is doubtful whether the ceasefire could hold for a long time, or even the ceasefire is successful, and whether the two sides could return to negotiations and finally settle their differences.

Whatsoever, as former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk once said, the two sides "have been condemned to live together" and only a peaceful solution could eradicate the roots of violence.







In This Section
 

Up till Friday, Israel and the Palestinians have been mired in the cycle of deadly violence for one year, dealing a heavy blow to both sides in terms of peace- making efforts, diplomacy and economy.

Advanced Search


 


 


Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved