Latest News:  
Beijing   Sunny/Cloudy    27 / 14 ℃  City Forecast

English>>Foreign Affairs

Officials say no Japan maritime deal in place

By Zhang Yunbi  (China Daily)

09:06, October 10, 2012

A Japanese media report accusing the Chinese navy of "ignoring" a requirement to inform Japanese counterparts of their presence in certain areas of the East China Sea was "not in accordance with the facts", a source within the Chinese Ministry of National Defense told China Daily on Tuesday.

Seven Chinese navy warships sailed through the Miyako Strait between Okinawa Island and Miyako Island in Okinawa Prefecture on Oct 4, according to the Kyodo News Agency, quoting the Japanese Defense Ministry.

The Chinese vessels were actually passing through international waters en route to the Pacific Ocean.

But leading Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun claimed on Monday the Chinese ships had not informed Japanese officials beforehand, and the move ignored an agreement between the countries to inform each other of any military movements through the strait.

Sankei said defense authorities on both sides this summer had reached an overall consensus on a "crisis management mechanism".

But a Ministry of National Defense official, who is familiar with the issue but declined to be named, denied the two countries' defense authorities had established such a mechanism, and said there is no agreement in place to inform each other of military traffic.

"The report does not reflect the facts," the official said.

Yin Zhuo, a Beijing-based military expert, said the Chinese ship movements were within international rules, and that Tokyo tends to view the presence of any Chinese navy ships in the East China Sea as a "threat".

Relations between Japan and China have been strained since Japanese coast guard vessels collided with a Chinese fishing boat in the waters off the Diaoyu Islands in September 2010.

In May, China and Japan held the first round of high-level consultations on maritime affairs in Hangzhou, East China's Zhejiang province, and both sides agreed on the need for a mechanism to deal with any potential future incidents.


【1】 【2】

Most viewed commentaries
Most viewed commentaries
Internationalization of Diaoyu issue cannot make water muddy Greater co-op with China will bring more benefits to US 3 questions for Japan: Intention of 'buying Diaoyu Islands'
How should we protect Diaoyu Islands? Diaoyu Islands issue tests U.S. political wisdom Why was the U.S. ambassador killed in Libya?

Email|Print|Comments(Editor:姚春、张茜)

Leave your comment0 comments

  1. Name

  

Selections for you


  1. Female pilots of FBC-1 fighters in training

  2. David Blaine completes "Electrified" stunt

  3. Ice train begins trial operations

  4. Top 8 October destinations in China

  5. How can we sustain love?

  6. Fascination China

Most Popular

Opinions

  1. Romney's post-debate bounce could soon fade
  2. War with Syria would be great mistake for Turkey
  3. Why being a runt can be an advantage
  4. Govt aid needed for solar firms to survive
  5. Chavez expected to boost China links
  6. Can US ‘enjoy the downward slide?’
  7. Editorial: Protectionism harmful
  8. US attack of Chinese autos baseless
  9. Violent protesters not representative of real issue
  10. Stronger China-EU partnership benefits both sides

What's happening in China

Sperm black market

  1. Breaking road rules gets more costly
  2. 6-year-old dies after being forced to run for hours
  3. Man accuses doctors in disappearance of kidney
  4. Air China flights in hoax call incidents
  5. Forced landing in NW China after terrorist warning

China Features

  1. Oregon official: We welcome Chinese investors
  2. Mid-Autumn Festival Keywords
  3. Culture invasion? Starbucks kisses Buddha
  4. Public should enjoy more 'tourism benefits'
  5. Ancient villages face losing their souls

PD Online Data

  1. Ministry of Water Resources
  2. Ministry of Railways
  3. People's Bank of China
  4. Ministry of Health
  5. Ministry of Culture