Latest News:  
Beijing   Cloudy    28 / 19 ℃  City Forecast

English>>Foreign Affairs

US position on Diaoyu Islands very dangerous


08:27, September 04, 2012

The United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will arrive in China Tuesday for a two-day trip to exchange views on a wide range of issues including reiterating the US position on the Diaoyu Islands.

As far as we know, however, the so-called US position on the Diaoyu Islands is very dangerous and is not conducive to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region.

What is the US position on the Diaoyu Islands?

According to the remarks made by the US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland at a regular briefing on August 28, the US stance could be boiled down to - the US claimed it does not take a position on the question of the ultimate sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands. It also stated the islands are under the administrative control of the government of Japan, so the islands fall under the scope of the US-Japan security treaty.

And Nuland also made it clear that Washington calls the islands by their Japanese name, the Senkaku Islands instead of the Diaoyu Islands, which bears serious connotations of "recognition" in international relations.

It's not difficult to tell that though the US government's position on the Diaoyu islands is contradictory, but in essence, it's very clear, that is, it supports the Japanese government's confrontational stance against China on the issue of the Diaoyu Islands.

The US-Japan security treaty's Article 5 stipulates that an armed attack against either party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be a threat to both countries.

People have reasons to show concern that the US's strong intervention into the issue of the Diaoyu Islands and its insistence on backing Japan will harden the position of the Japanese government and will encourage anti-China arrogance of the Japanese right-wing forces.

This would probably make the dispute more complicated and weaken the tenacity of a negotiated settlement. And this would be detrimental to the security and stability of East Asia and even the entire Asia-Pacific region.

【1】 【2】

Most viewed commentaries
Most viewed commentaries
US expertise gives it powerful role in maritime politics China and Japan should not be kidnapped by an old fogey Boom of US arms sales aggravates regional security dilemma
Japan aids armed forces of China's neighbors Japan’s hardline rhetoric on Diaoyu is ‘playing with fire' Japan must take Chinese people’s feeling seriously


Leave your comment0 comments

  1. Name


Selections for you

  1. Migrant workers' kids say goodbye till next year

  2. Lovely animals all over the world

  3. Answering the E-Waste Question

  4. Fly Kongming Lanterns for good fortune

  5. 10 best photos: New Scientist

  6. Cute chicks’ fashion show

Most Popular


  1. U.S. slows Israel pace to foil Iran's nuclear plan
  2. All officials must work to change negative image
  3. Right wing in Japan poisons Sino-Japanese ties
  4. Editorial: Wary of investment risks
  5. Why political solution to Syria's crisis always fail?

What's happening in China

New giant tower branded 'pants'

  1. Hunan denies kids used in GM food test
  2. Peking University to sue former professor for libel
  3. Migrant workers' kids say goodbye till next year
  4. Courts of original verdicts to hear retrials
  5. More groups can litigate in public interest

China Features

  1. Unforgetable images of London Olympics
  2. Clinton's high profile in S. Pacific with great pain
  3. Lovely animals all over the world
  4. Regimen: spleen-friendly diets during White Dew
  5. Watch out hay fever during Bai Lu

PD Online Data

  1. Ministry of Water Resources
  2. Ministry of Railways
  3. People's Bank of China
  4. Ministry of Health
  5. Ministry of Culture