How should China handle America's "return to Asia?"
14:39, December 06, 2010

Email | Print | Subscribe | Comments | Forum 
The United States has appeared on the Asian stage once again. Its "return to Asia" strategy has become increasingly clear, and China-U.S. relations have also attracted much attention worldwide since Obama took control of the White House.
People's Daily reporters interviewed Huang Ping, president of the Institute of American Studies under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, regarding China-U.S. relations.
US China policy changes from warm to cold
The U.S. policy on China has changed from warm to cold during the two years of the Obama administration. Obama immediately paid a visit to China when he first took control of the White House and showed more passion than former president George W. Bush.
However, the current changes are obvious, and the United States has begun to implement various sanctions, restrictions and inhibitions on China. In regard to the RMB exchange rate, although the United States has not labeled China as a "currency manipulator," it has shown an increasingly intense and loud voice regarding this issue in general.
The United States also directly or indirectly involved itself in China's relations with neighboring countries. It took a public stance or indirectly exerted influence regarding issues such as the Diaoyu Islands event and the conflicts in the South China Sea, Huang said.
Huang analyzed the reasons for the changes in the Obama administration's China policy, and said that the U.S. presidents have always adopted pragmatic domestic and foreign policies, and Obama is no exception.
Technically speaking, he appears even more pragmatic and traditional than his predecessor George W. Bush, as shown by far more diplomatic talks than military actions and far more multilateral than unilateral actions.
However, Obama does not completely reject idealism, and sometimes acts more like a bookish intellectual than an experienced politician. He has talked a lot but done little probably because it is much easier said than done. Whatever their governing styles are, the U.S. presidents always adhered to the rule that diplomacy and all other activities should serve U.S. national interests.
The United States replaced the United Kingdom as a global superpower after the end of World War II, and now needs to make efforts to maintain its hegemony across the world, in addition to safeguarding its sovereignty and ensuring its development like other countries.
The United States has not signed the U.N. Convention on Law of the Sea because it considers exclusive economic zones to be international waters, which, by its hegemonic logic, should be included in the U.S. sphere of influence. The U.S. sphere of influence covers not only outer space and international waters but also all fields in which it takes a lead in, such as the Internet, and doing so is its long-term national strategy. Any fast-developing country will be instinctively seen by the United States as a direct or indirect challenge to its hegemonic status.
Of course, the changes in the Obama administration's policy on China have various causes.
Objectively, the current domestic economic situation in the United States is terrible with a continued high unemployment rate. Made-in-China goods are seen here and there, which tends to make China the victim and scapegoat.
Furthermore, it is indeed s fact that China is experiencing a rapid development and the trend will continue in the future. In fact, China’s development pace over the first 30 years since its market-oriented reform has not slowed, but China did not draw so much attention like it does now because then, its development was low and small in terms of economic scale.
However, thanks to its reform, a 2 to 3 percentage point decrease in China's economic growth rate will make many other countries aware of its existence and greatly affect those countries, said Huang.
Another cause is Obama's inexperience in handling international affairs. Although Obama was very popular during the presidency campaign, he lacks practical executive experience. He has never been mayor, state governor or worked in government departments, and he served only one term as senator, so he is inexperienced in evaluating the world situation and handling relations with other powers.
Furthermore, Obama's team members, including Hillary Clinton, Bob Gates and Timothy Geithner, all have personal strengths, but how to coordinate their work is a big issue for Obama. In addition to the congress, the opposition party, media and interest groups, China is more prone to be the victim of the friction among various types of political forces in the United States.
By People's Daily Online
![]() |
(Editor:梁军)

Related Reading
Chinese FM talks with DPRK, ROK, U.S. diplomats on Korean Peninsular situation
Chinese, U.S. officials discuss cooperation in public diplomacy
Senior Chinese, U.S. officials agree to promote trade cooperation
China hopes to deepen cooperation with U.S. in "constructive manner": official
Chinese, U.S. presidents meet in Seoul on bilateral ties (3)
Chinese, U.S. presidents meet in Seoul on bilateral ties (2)

Tibet poised to embrace even brighter future, 60 years after peaceful liberation
Chinese official calls for more language, culture exchanges with foreign countries
Senior Chinese leader calls for efforts to develop new energy
Central gov't delegation arrives in Lhasa for Tibet Peaceful Liberation Celebrations
China Southern Airlines sends charter flight carrying peacekeepers to Liberia

