Netanyahu "right" to halt East Jerusalem building plan

09:41, March 04, 2010      

Email | Print | Subscribe | Comments | Forum 

by David Harris, Dave Bender

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come in for praise from an unusual quarter. The Israeli political left said he did the right thing when he persuaded the mayor of Jerusalem Nir Barkat to hold off on a controversial plan to redevelop an Arab part of the city.

However, Israeli analysts told Xinhua on Wednesday that it would appear that the agreement between the premier and the mayor is for a temporary freeze rather than a full-blown cancelation, and there will be no agreement on issues like this until there is a permanent peace deal between the Palestinians and Israelis.


Barkat on Tuesday unveiled an ambitious scheme to build new homes for Palestinians alongside a cultural center, park, hotels and more facilities for the residents of Silwan, which lies just outside Jerusalem's famed Old City.

Around the time that Barkat was holding a news conference to announce the project, Netanyahu's office issued a statement saying it had convinced Barkat to hold off.

Netanyahu asked Barkat to work harder at finding an equitable housing solution for some 750 Arabs living in 88 structures on the King's Garden or al-Bustan area, some of the buildings slated to be demolished in the comprehensive upgrade over the next decade.

"I'm happy to accept the prime minister's request," said Barkat at the news conference.

Barkat insisted "the plan is for the benefit of the residents, alongside the importance of developing the area for the benefit of the world, for the benefit of tourists and for the beauty of Jerusalem."

But Palestinians hold little trust in Israeli promises to improve the area. Local Arab residents say the plan is a political ploy meant to gradually remove them from the area, and populate it with Jewish residents instead.

"I haven't seen any master plan for eastern Jerusalem for 43 years, not in the past and not in the future," said Daoud Siyam, a local Arab resident living in a house slated for demolition.

Barkat "tries to sell his stinking, filthy game that we've been hearing since 1967," he told Xinhua.

The 35-year-old taxi driver said he fears the plan will result in a slow "transfer of Arabs" out of the area on behalf of the eight Jewish families, living in nearby Jonathan House. The seven- story apartment was built without a permit in 2004, which faces Siyam's house from the nearby hillside.


While Barkat's plan may, at first glance, appear to be no different to planning issues the world over. But any moves in Jerusalem, particularly on its eastern side, are not only highly controversial but can lead, and indeed in the past have led, to bloodshed.

Silwan lies across the green line, in what the international community determines to be occupied territory, an area the Palestinians would like to see as the capital of their future state. However, in Israeli law, all sections of municipal Jerusalem are part and parcel of the capital of the Jewish state.

As a result, all building work carried out by Israel in the Arab-dominated east of the city is seen by the United States and elsewhere as "unilateral measures" that "create facts on the ground." The U.S. State Department dubs this type of action " unhelpful."

"What's amazing is that Netanyahu did the right thing," said Gershon Baskin, the joint CEO of the Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information.

He argues that Barkat's idea was not necessarily bad and could have been of benefit to the people of Silwan, but the municipality was implementing it in the wrong manner.

"You have to do this in cooperation. You can't do this as a unilateral plan of the municipality," said Baskin.


Netanyahu asked Barkat to agree to the delay for two main reasons, said Ira Sharkansky, a professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

The Israeli prime minister saw the Arab reaction to the plan and did not want to create further tension at a time when sensitivities in Jerusalem are already running high, according to Sharkansky.

Last week Palestinians on the Temple Mount and elsewhere in the city clashed with Israeli police officers, after Netanyahu decides to add two West Bank shrines to a list of Israeli national heritage sites.

Secondly, Netanyahu already has his work cut out with the U.S. administration and does not need to add steam to that pressure cooker.

There are suggestions in Israel that it was Washington that put its foot down and told Netanyahu he could not go ahead with the project. "I am sure that (U.S. Secretary of State) Hillary ( Clinton) or someone from the president's office called Netanyahu and said 'don't do this,'" suggested Baskin.

U.S. President Barack Obama has repeatedly made clear his opposition to any Israeli building work in the occupied territories. Amongst other reasons, the Americans object because they are well aware that the Palestinians are refusing to return to the negotiating table until Israel implements a full construction freeze in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Washington's thinking seemed to be in Barkat's mind when he spoke with reporters to explain the delay. "We have to continue with a lot of care, with a lot of listening, but we have to also make sure that the plan is successful, because the alternatives are much, much worse," Barkat said.

While Baskin agrees that Netanyahu did the right thing regarding Silwan, he argues there will be no agreement on issues like this until there is a permanent peace deal between the Palestinians and Israelis.

Source: Xinhua
  • Do you have anything to say?


Special Coverage
Major headlines
Editor's Pick
  • Israel reaffirms readiness to start talks with Palestinians
  • Triple suicide bombings kill 30 in Iraq ahead of elections
  • Malaysian Chinese promote wearing of traditional Chinese coustumes
  • Beauty of traditional shadow play art
  • Chinese envoy reiterates China's support to Darfur peace efforts
  • Delighted music of Lusheng praises hometown
Most Popular
Hot Forum Dicussion