Latest News:  
Beijing   Sunny/Cloudy    20 / 10 ℃  City Forecast

English>>World

If Romney wins White House, it all starts in Denver (2)

By Matthew Rusling (Xinhua)

09:40, November 02, 2012

Key to that performance was that many Americans got their first up-close look at the challenger, who did not resemble the heartless capitalist portrayed in team Obama's myriad attack ads, analysts said.

Moreover, for a contender that has in the past had difficulty communicating with the public, debate watchers, pundits and U.S. media had no such impression that night. Romney was feisty and pulled no punches, but remained sincere and likable.

"The first debate was a game-changer because (Romney's) campaign was lacking heading into that debate," said Republican Strategist Ford O'Connell. "Now clearly he has the momentum on his side, but will it be enough to close the deal," that will remain unknown until the ballots are cast and counted, he added.

Two weeks later the two candidates faced off a second time in a town hall forum in which audience members asked the candidates questions. In desperate need of a comeback, the president came out swinging. But while Romney lost on points, at one point he stammered while discussing the September attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, he was still able to pick up two points the next day in a Gallup daily tracking poll.

The third and final debate, which focused on foreign policy, surprised many, as Romney's strategy was to avoid casting himself as a warmonger in a war-weary nation, while presenting himself as a viable choice for commander-in-chief.

He agreed with Obama on a number of points, choosing not to be overly combative. He chose to let slide the controversy over the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, who were killed in an attack on the U.S. consulate on Sept. 11 in Benghazi. Again, he lost on points. But that did not seem to matter, because he continued to gain in the polls.

An upset would mark the third time in U.S. history that a presidential election's outcome is determined by debates, and the victory would serve as the final episode in a historical trilogy, the first chapter being in 1960 when former President John F. Kennedy beat Richard Nixon and the second in 2000 when the then Republican candidate George W. Bush won the debates against then Vice President Al Gore.

【1】 【2】

Most viewed commentaries
World News in Photo
U.S. naval vessels cruise in waters near China Russian aerobatic team to perform in China's air show Joy and distress fill the air during Eid festival
Hurricane Sandy hits United States N. Korea's Kim attends university anniversary celebration Houston air show kicks off

Email|Print|Comments(Editor:朱蕤、姚春)

Related Reading

Leave your comment0 comments

  1. Name

  

Selections for you


  1. Troops in field tactical training

  2. PLA, U.S. army bands hold joint concert

  3. A review on U.S. warships pulled in HK

  4. People have fun at Angry Birds theme park

  5. Cute giant panda cubs

  6. China's manufacturing picks up in October

  7. Fairyland-like "Beauty Valley" in China's Sichuan

  8. World's most famous luxury limos

Most Popular

Opinions

  1. Noda cabinet hangs by a thread
  2. Strong yuan poses risk for economy
  3. Time to rethink music profit models
  4. Policy support for private sector
  5. Japan urged to face change on Diaoyu issue
  6. What kind of 'busy culture' do we need?
  7. 'Noah's Flood' breaks down the cultural barrier
  8. A vital asset for emerging ratings agency
  9. Clearing the path for global currency
  10. Why scary Chinese movies are so scarce

What’s happening in China

Cute giant panda cubs

  1. Security check includes pat down of bra, undies
  2. Banned drug found in pork sample
  3. Lingang tourism plan attracts key criticism
  4. Migrants to be half of city population
  5. Fines set for overseas births over legal limits